🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 958+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

RSVP crystal sash

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(958 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9
$15
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

RSVP crystals on white sash total length 72 fresh with tags MSRP 26.00

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy Shipping

↩️
easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

RSVP crystal sash

RSVP crystals on white sash total length 72" recent with tags MSRP 26.00

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1750683

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Chain

Original Price:$15 USD

Sale Price:$9 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 transport & Returns

βœ“ gratis fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6200 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this​
Nice design and quality RSVP crystal sash.
10 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant RSVP crystal sash
Personally, the RSVP crystal sash does its job so I’m okay with it. Packaging was elementary.
50 people found this helpful
TT​
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Absolutely flawless
cherish the RSVP crystal sash! Better than expected for the price.
21 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
solely what I wanted
Personally, the RSVP crystal sash works as described and it’s fine overall.
23 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate this RSVP crystal sash!
So far, it works well enough which is good enough. distribution was normal.
44 people found this helpful